Blog

Gold!

Have you ever had any doubts about gold? Does it sometimes feel like it should be performing better? Are you concerned about its volatility? Do you worry about how it might perform in the future? Have you ever wondered about its true purchasing power? Maybe you’re nervous about a big drop in price again? I decided to go directly to the source to address these concerns: Gold himself. He put his arm around me and asked me to tell you a few things…

I hear that you’ve had some worries about me. I understand. Your world is a very uncertain place right now. And when it comes to money, it looks as though your leaders don’t understand some basic monetary principles, making things even more unsettling.

But I want you to know that the problems you’re experiencing are actually nothing new. I’ve seen these monetary, fiscal, and economic difficulties many times before. And I can tell you this: you’re safe with me. That’s a bold proclamation, but I’ve provided monetary protection numerous times throughout history — too many to count, in fact. I’ve served all kinds of people over the centuries, from kings and counts to serfs and servants.

To put your mind at ease, let’s review my core characteristics, along with some history, to show how I can protect you against the monetary danger that’s likely to worsen in your near future. We’ll also take a look at your peculiar set of circumstances to see how I can be of service. By the time we’re done, I think you’ll feel much better about my ability to help your portfolio withstand whatever is thrown its way.

Enduring Characteristics

Let’s start with the basics. I have some characteristics that no other matter on Earth has…

I cannot be:

  • Printed (ask a miner how long it takes to find me and dig me up)
  • Counterfeited (you can try, but a scale will catch it every time)
  • Inflated (I can’t be reproduced)

I cannot be destroyed by;

  • Fire (it takes heat at least 1945.4 degrees F. to melt me)
  • Water (I don’t rust or tarnish)
  • Time (my coins remain recognizable after a thousand years)

I don’t need:

  • Feeding (like cattle)
  • Fertilizer (like corn)
  • Maintenance (like printing presses)

I have no:

  • Time limit (most metal is still in existence)
  • Counterparty risk (remember MF Global?)
  • Shelf life (I never expire)

As a metal, I am uniquely:

  • Malleable (I spread without cracking)
  • Ductile (I stretch without breaking)
  • Beautiful (I am the ultimate accessory)

As money, I am:

  • Liquid (easily convertible to cash)
  • Portable (you can conveniently hold $30,000 in one hand)
  • Divisible (you can use me in tiny fractions)
  • Consistent (I am the same in any quantity, at any place)
  • Private (no one has to know you own me)

I am internationally accepted, last for thousands of years, and probably most important, you can’t make any more of me.

And by the way, don’t fret about those who say I’m not as good an asset as an income-producing vehicle. They misunderstand my role. I’m not trying to be a stock, for example. My function is as money and a store of value, so the proper comparison is to your dollars, or what you call Treasury Bills (of similar nominal value). And here is where I excel and serve my purpose: since 1913, the US dollar has lost 96% of its purchasing power. I have lost none.

Remember, I am the only financial asset that is not simultaneously someone else’s liability. I don’t require the backing of any bank or government.

The History Lesson

Because I am eons old, I’ve observed something throughout history that you may not be aware of: government fiat currencies are a relatively new invention, and none has endured.

Eventually, they have all failed. Me? I’ve never been defaulted on or worth zero. Remember this the next time you have any doubts about my long-term worth.

You can rest assured that over time, I will hold my value. And when you near the end of your life, you can pass me on to your loved ones, knowing full well they will have something that cannot be devalued, debased, or destroyed.

What Color Is Your Money?

Like you, I’m concerned about the current state of fiscal and monetary affairs. It seems your government leaders have boxed themselves into a corner. They’ve incurred too much debt and are spending too much money. It’s important that you understand some lessons from history about this kind of behavior so that you’re certain of what I can do for you.

The common denominators that lead to the downfall of every fiat currency are the two big Ds: debts and deficits. With that in mind, consider the following:

  • Detailed studies of government debt levels over the past 100 years show that debts have never been repaid (in original currency units) when they have exceeded 80% of GDP. US government debt will exceed 100% of GDP this year.
  • Investment legend Marc Faber reports that once a country’s payments on debt exceed 30% of tax revenue, the currency is “done for.” By some estimates, the US will hit that ratio this year.
  • Peter Bernholz, a leading expert on hyperinflation, states unequivocally that “hyperinflation is caused by government budget deficits.” Next year’s US budget deficit is projected to be $1.3 trillion.

The solution many of your leaders are pursuing is to create more currency units. The US monetary base has exploded 205.8% during the last three years, while my price is only up 65.8%. This fact, alone, implies that my price in dollars is likely to climb much higher.

This is also the reason why I’m not in a bubble, as some have tried to claim. It is your central banks and bond markets that are in a bubble. The fact that my price is rising is a warning that what your leaders are doing is unsustainable and potentially dangerous to your currency.

Think about this: the US has debt backed by debt, based on debt, dependent on debt, and leveraged with debt. You can, for example, buy a bond (i.e., lend money) on margin (i.e., with borrowed money). This is not a sound way to run financial markets.

Meanwhile, the warning bells continue to sound regarding Europe’s debt crisis. In just the past 30 days:

  • Moody’s cautioned that it may cut the triple-A status of France, Austria, and the UK; and it downgraded six other European nations including Italy, Spain, and Portugal.
  • Standard & Poor’s cut the triple-A status of France and Austria, while Italy, Spain, Portugal, Cyprus, Malta, Slovakia, and Slovenia were downgraded.
  • Fitch downgraded Belgium, Cyprus, Italy, Slovenia, and Spain, and stated there was a 50% chance of further cuts in the next two years.
  • Standard & Poor’s downgraded 34 of Italy’s 37 banks.
  • Moody’s warned just last week that it may cut the credit ratings of 17 global financial institutions and 114 European ones.

The European crisis is far from over; and the path of least resistance for politicians is to create more currency units. This action can and will have clear and direct consequences: currencies will devalue, and inflation — perhaps hyperinflation — will result.

Once again, I encourage you to use me to protect some of your wealth.

How Much Is Enough?

Given the state of your monetary system, you should accumulate me (and silver) on a regular basis. Just buy some every month and put it in a safe place. After what I’ve witnessed throughout history, and based on the current path your government leaders insist on pursuing, I suggest using me as your savings vehicle instead of putting dollars in a bank.

If you don’t own enough of me when these fiscal troubles really accelerate, I fear you will regret it. I’ve warned many in the past about the dilution of nations’ currencies, and those who didn’t heed my warnings experienced severe financial pain. Excuses won’t pay the mortgage nor feed the family when the effects of currency debasement hit your home and pocketbook.

Make sure you own enough of me to make a difference to your portfolio. This means having more than a couple coins or a few shares of GLD, the latter of which is only a proxy for my price.

How do you know if you own enough? Ask yourself:

  • If inflation returns, or even hyperinflation hits…
  • If the economy is flat…
  • If uncertainty and fear continue around the globe…
  • If stock markets languish…
  • If the amount of spending from the world’s governments proves futile…
  • If government interference in the economy continues to increase…
  • If the value of the US dollar takes a major fall…
  • If the world enters a recession or depression…
  • If you wonder if you have enough “safe” money…

…would you feel that you own enough of me?

Read more: By Gold http://dailyreckoning.com/by-gold/#ixzz1ncmq47ue

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How Warren Buffett Looks at Stocks vs. Gold Investing

Where we part company with Warren Buffet…

Here’s the Sage of Omaha, explaining, in Fortune Magazine, why bonds are dangerous:

Investments that are denominated in a given currency include money-market funds, bonds, mortgages, bank deposits, and other instruments. Most of these currency-based investments are thought of as “safe.” In truth they are among the most dangerous of assets. Their beta may be zero, but their risk is huge.

Over the past century these instruments have destroyed the purchasing power of investors in many countries, even as these holders continued to receive timely payments of interest and principal. This ugly result, moreover, will forever recur. Governments determine the ultimate value of money, and systemic forces will sometimes cause them to gravitate to policies that produce inflation. From time to time such policies spin out of control.

Even in the US, where the wish for a stable currency is strong, the dollar has fallen a staggering 86% in value since 1965, when I took over management of Berkshire. It takes no less than $7 today to buy what $1 did at that time. Consequently, a tax-free institution would have needed 4.3% interest annually from bond investments over that period to simply maintain its purchasing power. Its managers would have been kidding themselves if they thought of any portion of that interest as “income.”

For taxpaying investors like you and me, the picture has been far worse. During the same 47-year period, continuous rolling of US Treasury bills produced 5.7% annually. That sounds satisfactory. But if an individual investor paid personal income taxes at a rate averaging 25%, this 5.7% return would have yielded nothing in the way of real income. This investor’s visible income tax would have stripped him of 1.4 points of the stated yield, and the invisible inflation tax would have devoured the remaining 4.3 points. It’s noteworthy that the implicit inflation “tax” was more than triple the explicit income tax that our investor probably thought of as his main burden. “In God We Trust” may be imprinted on our currency, but the hand that activates our government’s printing press has been all too human.

High interest rates, of course, can compensate purchasers for the inflation risk they face with currency-based investments — and indeed, rates in the early 1980s did that job nicely. Current rates, however, do not come close to offsetting the purchasing-power risk that investors assume. Right now bonds should come with a warning label.

Under today’s conditions, therefore, I do not like currency-based investments.

Buffet goes on to explain why he doesn’t like gold either. He points out that since 1965 the total return on gold (not adjusted for inflation) was 4,455%. But the total return on stocks was higher, at 6,072%.

The difference between the two is that gold is a ‘sterile’ investment, says Buffet. Stocks are not. He’s right. Gold is only useful at protecting purchasing power when the monetary system is in danger. At almost all other times, you’re better off with stocks…businesses…farmland or another productive asset.

That’s why Buffet now prefers stocks. And it is why we now prefer gold.

Buffet willingly gives up the protection of gold in order to the get the upside from stocks. We willingly give up the upside from stocks in order to get the protection from gold. Who’s right?

Read more: How Warren Buffett Looks at Stocks vs. Gold Investing

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gold Loses its Uncertainty Hedge

I’m going to stray a bit from my normal go-through on the markets. I’ll still give a brief update, and then I’m going to go into all this confusion. If that doesn’t interest you, then after the update, simply skip ahead.

OK. The currencies, which had backed off their lofty Monday values on Tuesday, remained in a tight range yesterday afternoon and overnight. This morning, Germany business sentiment, as measured by the think tank Ifo, showed a fourth-consecutive improvement in the business climate for Germany. Here are the Ifo readings for the past four months:

Oct. 106.5
Nov. 106.7
Dec. 107.3
Jan. 108.3

I think this plays well with my thought that things will settle down and stabilize a bit in the eurozone this year. Given the improvement in manufacturing that I reported yesterday, and the improvement in the Ifo, I would think that the European Central Bank (ECB) would think twice about cutting rates further. But then, I’ve said that a couple of times before and the ECB with its new president, Mario Draghi, went ahead and cut rates any way!

Oh, well. As I said above, the currencies are range trading, with the euro a quarter cent below 1.30 this morning. I don’t know how many times I watched the euro climb above 1.30 yesterday, only to fall back below the figure and then do it all over again.

First of all, ever since I began managing the risk of the currency book at Mark Twain Bank in 1992, I have been a believer in “trends”: weak trends, strong trends and no gray area. The dollar would go into a weak trend for a fundamental reason and not come out of the trend until that fundamental reason was corrected or well on the way to correcting. And then a strong trend would begin for another fundamental reason, and so on.

I believed that trends are what move assets, not charts. A trend, however, is not a one-way street. And those of you who have heard me speak over the years know that I always make a point of that. I never believed the dollar would collapse, or even remain in a weak trend for longer than previous trends lasted. The longest trend was a weak dollar trend that began with the meeting at the Plaza Hotel in New York City. The Plaza Accord sent the dollar on a weak trend that began in 1985 and lasted 10 years.

We have just passed the 10-year mark for the current weak dollar trend. So it’s time to rethink all this, right? Can the dollar remain in the weak trend for longer than 10 years? And what could bring it out of the weak trend? Remember, the fundamental reason it went into the weak trend to begin with: exploding debt. In 2001, the debt to current account level hit 4.5%, which was an indicator that the dollar was about to experience a currency crisis, for historically, that had been the case.

What has happened to that so-called exploding debt in 2001? The explosions have gotten larger and larger and larger, until they are completely off the charts! I like to tell people all the time that the U.S. needs to go down the road to debt reduction before the dollar can leave the weak trend. But the U.S. hasn’t even found that road!

So the other day, I was sitting at home, reading, and I just fell right out of my chair. The thought entered my mind that maybe, just maybe, the dollar is in serious trouble, even more serious than having the reserve currency title stripped from it. The total of unfunded liabilities in this country today is greater than $117 trillion! And in three short years, those unfunded liabilities will be greater than $143,685,000,000,000! And if the taxpayers are tapped to pay for this, they will have to cough up $1,175,537,000 apiece!

I was looking at these numbers and thought if the markets think Greece can’t pay its debts, how are we going to pay for this? The answer that most people that follow this stuff give is we’ll just print dollars to pay out debts. And that’s where the rubber meets the road with dollar value. It just won’t have any…

Read more: Gold Temporarily Loses its Uncertainty Hedge

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Strange Appetite for US Debt

We went around the world last week. We wish we could say we learned something. But modern travel has been standardized…and culture and technology have been “globalized”…so that the more you travel the more you feel you never left home.

“How was your trip around the world?” asked our assistant when we got back in the office in Baltimore.

“No problem. Nothing special,” we replied.

How could a trip around the world not be ‘special’? Well, the airports all look alike. The planes are all alike. The restaurants and hotels are all alike, usually international chains. So are the shops…and the products.

You can travel to the far side of the globe…and except for the fact that you can’t quite remember where you are…or what time it is…you might as well have stayed put…

Returning to the US…

We got the big news when we picked up a copy of USA Today in the LA airport.

“Light at the end of the debt tunnel?” asked the headline.

We thought we knew the answer before we started reading.

But the report in USA Today tells the results of a study by McKinsey Global Institute. As a percentage of GDP, the US cut its “private and public debt” by 16 points, since 2008, it says. That puts it tied with South Korea in the debt-cutting derby.

We were only a paragraph into this report when we began to suspect that neither the reporter nor the McKinsey researchers had any idea what was going on…

Read more: Economic News and Ideas on Debt, the Market, Gold, Oil, and Investing.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Who are your Friends? :)

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment